Over the last 20 years, GDP of Bangladesh, measured in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP), grew from USD 167.6 billion to USD 761.7 billion in 2018. This shows that GDP based on PPP is rising at an increasing annual rate that reached a maximum of 10.2 percent in 2018. Such an increase is reflective of an enlargement of the middle-class.
While the above clearly has economic consequences, it also has social ones. The middle-class expectations are rising and evolving as the country’s economic situation improves. People are no longer satisfied with simply having access to public services; they are increasingly concerned with their quality as more middle-class citizens recognise their potential to bring about social change.
This, in turn, may have repercussions for poverty and inequality, assuming that the government is able to meet public demands. It is widely recognised that causes of poverty include insufficient access to public resources such as education and healthcare, especially for the rural residents. If public resources devoted to these services are not only increased but the quality of services is also improved, it is likely that poverty will be reduced further. What appears to be certain is that the rise of the middle-class in Bangladesh has a number of positive consequences. A rapid growth of the middle-class is needed to reduce poverty, bring about economic expansion, and increase social opportunities.
At present, globalisation is under attack in the west. The resistance to globalisation largely originates from economic losses of the middle-class; and the fear of further losses in future. No doubt, growth of trade has brought economic competition from China, reducing high-wage manufacturing and service jobs. The expectations are ripe that future changes will be worse in terms of economic and social consequences for the middle-class in the developed west.
What is happening to the middle-class in Bangladesh? Over the last three decades, the opening and integration of markets has led to the emergence of a rapidly growing and forward-looking middle-class in Bangladesh. This budding middle class—no doubt relatively poor compared with the middle class elsewhere—enjoys high morale and spirit, big expectations, and rising sense of a bright future. Thus, as opposed to the fading middle-class in the west, Bangladesh’s middle-class is winning. The new middle-class is on the rise; growing in numbers and capturing an increasing share of total income in the country.
Branko Milanovic, an economist, draws an “elephant” curve, to capture the income story of the middle-class decline in the west and middle-class rise in the developing world. The chart shows the status of income groups from poor-rich to represent the group’s shares of total global income over the period between 1988 and 2011.
Almost half of the world’s population, with incomes of less than USD 1 to about USD 4, are counted as poor and live almost entirely in the developing world. Another 40 percent of the world’s population, with income between USD 4 to USD 50 a day, make up an “incipient” (below USD 10 a day) middle-class; with the exception of a small proportion of that group living in rich countries, this is the “new” middle-class of the developing world. Together, these groups are represented by the broad and hunched back of the elephant. A much smaller rich world middle-class has income between USD 50 to USD 200; they are represented by the elephant’s head. Finally, a tiny world’s rich group—including the top 1 percent of households in the world by income and are represented by the elephant’s trunk.
The elephant curve illustrates that the middle-classes in the developing world (broad back of the elephant) have been the big winners of open and globalised markets, growing in size and enjoying income gains. In contrast, rich world’s middle-class declined as a share of population and appears stuck at the bottom of the elephant’s trunk.
Behind the big and broad back of the elephant is rapid economic growth in the developing world—at rates faster than economic growth in the mature developed economies. Higher growth helped boost the size of the USD 10-a-day middle-class not only in Bangladesh, but also in most countries of Asia, especially in China and India. Taking advantage of technologies and other factors, the developing world is finally catching up to faster growing rich countries in a process that economists call income “convergence”. For Bangladesh, trade means the integration of its huge low-wage labour force into the global labour market, such as in the RMGs. No doubt, trade and foreign investment have accelerated the spread of new technologies and associated know-how to Bangladesh—thus increasing its ability to compete in the production and export of manufactured goods.
In the developed west, globalisation is associated with the increasing concentration of income and wealth at the top and the relative loss of influence of the old middle-class to the new professional and business elite—the one percent in the US that captured more than 20 percent of income and over 40 percent of wealth in 2014. The gap between the rich and the middle-class has been quantified by the French economist Thomas Piketty and his colleagues. In the US in 2015, the top 10 percent of households by income captured more than 50 percent of all income; and the top 1 percent captured 22 percent of all income.
The government’s role is to put policies in place to fight the vulnerabilities of the middle-class and benefit from middle-class support. These policies should promote upward social mobility such as quality education, and provide safety nets that protect the vulnerable segments when facing life risks. If high quality of publicly provided services can be ensured, a constituency for comprehensive contribution-based social protection system can be built with support from the middle-class. However, if publicly-provided services are of low quality, the middle-class will perceive themselves as losers in the fiscal bargain and may not be willing to finance the public system.
No doubt, the concept of middle-class is somewhat vague and corresponds to different lifestyles; and it may be hard to see how this heterogeneous group would position itself in society. Moreover, it is widely noted that these classes are driven mostly by self-interest; they strongly feel that their interests should be protected and are likely to oppose even good reforms that affect them in any negative way. They are extremely unwilling to compromise their group’s interests and privileges.
People also cite evidence for representatives of the middle-class who are more likely to guard their relative privileges against the incursions of poorer classes than champion alternatives that would help to reduce poverty. The middle-class is often branded to be more concerned with retaining its privileges and remaining loyal to the government that made its social advancement possible than in greater social justice and equality. The middle-class helps a regime to maintain the status quo. Thus, they may not become progressive drivers of social reforms that would benefit the majority.
Despite these structural limitations of the middle-class, the rising expectations of the expanding middle-class in Bangladesh signal its awakening with its own specificities; and the key question is: will this middle-class be the country’s future agent of change?
Mustafa K Mujeri is executive director, Institute for Inclusive Finance and Development (InM).
Source: The Daily Star.